ENIC-NARIC France
Assessed the programme's alignment with the European Qualifications Framework at level 5. Review covered learning outcomes, credit equivalence, and prior learning recognition procedures.
Accreditation & Standards
Recognised
credentials in Python
mobile education
Trackfloworavex's Python mobile game development programme operates under verified educational standards. This page documents the bodies that have reviewed our curriculum, the criteria applied, and the process we follow to maintain compliance.
Three independent bodies
reviewed our
programme
Each organisation assessed a distinct dimension of the curriculum — technical rigour, pedagogical structure, and digital delivery quality. Their findings informed specific revisions to course sequencing and assessment design.
France Compétences
Evaluated the programme against the Répertoire National des Certifications Professionnelles criteria, focusing on occupational relevance of Python and game engine competencies taught in the course.
Qualiopi Auditors
Conducted a process audit under the national quality label for training providers. The review examined learner support procedures, instructor qualification records, and continuous improvement documentation.
Compliance across three frameworks What each standard requires and how the programme meets it
| Requirement | EQF Level 5 | RNCP Criteria | Qualiopi Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defined learning outcomes per module | |||
| Formative and summative assessment | |||
| Instructor qualification documentation | |||
| Occupational relevance evidence | |||
| Learner feedback and revision cycle | |||
| Accessibility and digital delivery standards |
How the review cycle works Ongoing, not one-time
Accreditation at Trackfloworavex is treated as a recurring operational process rather than a credential obtained once. Each stage below runs on a defined schedule and produces documented output that feeds into the next cycle.
01
Curriculum mapping
Before each audit, the instructional team maps every module against the applicable framework's competency descriptors. Gaps identified at this stage are resolved internally before external review begins.
02
External audit submission
Documentation packages — including syllabi, assessment rubrics, learner outcome data, and instructor records — are submitted to the relevant body. Auditors may request supplementary materials or conduct remote interviews.
03
Findings and revision
Audit findings are categorised by severity. Mandatory corrections are addressed within 30 days. Advisory recommendations enter the programme's standard revision queue and are resolved before the following cohort begins.
04
Annual self-assessment
Between external audits, the team conducts an internal review against the same criteria. Results are logged and made available to auditors on request, providing continuity of evidence across review periods.